Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evers, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Provin, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Evers, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Provin, T. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Evers, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Provin, T. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops

Comparison of Bermudagrass, Bahiagrass, and Kikuyugrass as a Standing Hay Crop

G. W. Eversa,*, L. A. Redmona and T. L. Provinb

a Texas A&M Univ. Agricultural Research and Extension Center, P.O. Box 200, Overton, TX 75684
b Soil and Crop Sciences Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Interaction of month and cultivar on standing forage mass of warm-season perennial grasses managed as a standing hay crop during the autumn and winter of 1999–2000 at Overton, TX. Vertical bars indicate LSD value (P = 0.05) within months.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Interaction of month and cultivar on standing forage mass of warm-season perennial grasses managed as a standing hay crop during the autumn and winter of 2001–2002 at Overton, TX. Vertical bars indicate LSD value (P = 0.05) within months.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Interaction of month and cultivar on crude protein of warm-season perennial grasses managed as a standing hay crop during the autumn and winter of 2000–2001 at Overton, TX. Vertical bars indicate LSD value (P = 0.05) within months.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Interaction of month and cultivar on crude protein of warm-season perennial grasses managed as a standing hay crop during the autumn and winter of 2001–2002 at Overton, TX. Vertical bars indicate LSD value (P = 0.05) within months.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Interaction of month and cultivar on acid detergent fiber of warm-season perennial grasses managed as a standing hay crop during the autumn and winter of 1999–2000 at Overton, TX. Vertical bars indicate LSD value (P = 0.05) within months.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Interaction of month and cultivar on acid detergent fiber of warm-season perennial grasses managed as a standing hay crop during the autumn and winter of 2000–2001 at Overton, TX. Vertical bars indicate LSD value (P = 0.05) within months.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Crop Science Society of America.