Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DaCosta, M.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DaCosta, M.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by DaCosta, M.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Turfgrass

Physiological Adaptation of Kentucky Bluegrass to Localized Soil Drying

Michelle DaCosta, Zhaolong Wang and Bingru Huang*

Dep. of Plant Biology and Pathology, Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ 08901



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Responses of Award and Nuglade turf quality (TQ) to drought stress. Vertical bars are LSD values (p = 0.05) within a cultivar for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Leaf relative water content (RWC) in response to drought stress. Vertical bars are LSD values (p = 0.05) within a cultivar for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Response of cell membrane stability, as indicated by electrolyte leakage (EL) from cells in response to drought stress. Vertical bars are LSD values (p = 0.05) within a cultivar for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Responses of shoot growth rate in response to drought stress. Vertical bars are LSD values (p = 0.05) within a cultivar for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Responses of photosynthesis (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), and transpiration (E) in response to drought stress. Vertical bars are LSD values (p = 0.05) within a cultivar for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6. Leaf ABA accumulation in response to drought stress. Vertical bars are LSD values (p = 0.05) within a cultivar for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Crop Science Society of America.