Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fritschi, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hutmacher, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fritschi, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hutmacher, R. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fritschi, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hutmacher, R. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Seasonal Nitrogen Concentration, Uptake, and Partitioning Pattern of Irrigated Acala and Pima Cotton as Influenced by Nitrogen Fertility Level

Felix B. Fritschi*,a, Bruce A. Robertsc, Robert L. Travisb, D. William Rainsb and Robert B. Hutmacherd

a 141 Experiment Station Road, P.O. Box 345, Stoneville, MS 38776 (Previously at: Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616)
b Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616
c University of California Cooperative Extension, 680 N. Campus Drive, Ste. A, Hanford, CA 93230
d University of California, Shafter Research and Extension Center, 17053 N. Shafter Ave., Shafter CA 93263



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Total above ground plant N uptake and partitioning over the growing season in Acala cotton grown on Panoche clay loam in 1998, 1999, and 2000 as affected by N treatment. The control treatment received no N fertilizer while the amount of N applied in the other treatments was determined by subtracting early-season soil nitrate-N levels (top 0.6 m) from the target N levels of 56, 112, 168, and 224 kg N ha–1. Vertical bars represent standard errors of means for total above ground N content.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Total above ground plant N uptake and partitioning over the growing season in Acala cotton grown on Wasco sandy loam in 1998, 1999, and 2000 as affected by N treatment. The control treatment received no N fertilizer while the amount of N applied in the other treatments was determined by subtracting early-season soil nitrate-N levels (top 0.6 m) from the target N levels of 56, 112, 168, and 224 kg N ha–1. Vertical bars represent standard errors of means for total above ground N content.

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Total above ground plant N uptake and partitioning over the growing season in Pima cotton grown on Panoche clay loam in 1999 and 2000 as affected by N treatment. The control treatment received no N fertilizer while the amount of N applied in the other treatments was determined by subtracting early-season soil nitrate-N levels (top 0.6 m) from the target N levels of 56, 112, 168, and 224 kg N ha–1. Vertical bars represent standard errors of means for total above ground N content.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Crop Science Society of America.