Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seker, H.
Right arrow Articles by Brink, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Seker, H.
Right arrow Articles by Brink, G. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Seker, H.
Right arrow Articles by Brink, G. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Legumes
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Root Development

White Clover Morphology Changes with Stress Treatments

Hayati Sekera, Dennis E. Rowe*,b and Geoffrey E. Brinkc

a Eastern Anatolian Agricultural Research Institute Dadaskent-Eruzurum, Turkey
b USDA-ARS, Waste Management and Forage Research Unit, 810 Highway 12 East, Mississippi State, MS 39762
c USDA-ARS, U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, 1925 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Path analysis on leaf dry weight with direct effects of stolon DW, stolon length, root DW, and apex number and their indirect effects (correlations). Separate estimates were made for each of the four management treatments. ns Indicates that direct effect coefficients are not significantly different from zero at {alpha} = 0.05 and unmarked coefficients are significant.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Path analysis on root DW with direct effects of stolon DW, stolon length, and apex number and their indirect effects (correlations). Separate estimates were made for each of the four management treatments. ns Indicates that direct effect coefficients are not significantly different from zero at {alpha} = 0.05 and unmarked coefficients are significant.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Path analysis on herbage DW with direct effects of apex number, root DW, and stolon length and their indirect effects (correlations). Separate estimates were made for each of the four management treatments. ns Indicates that direct effect coefficients are not significantly different from zero at {alpha} = 0.05 and unmarked coefficients are significant.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Crop Science Society of America.