Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Argyris, J.
Right arrow Articles by TeKrony, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Argyris, J.
Right arrow Articles by TeKrony, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Argyris, J.
Right arrow Articles by TeKrony, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Plant Disease
Right arrow Seed Production

Fusarium graminearum Infection during Wheat Seed Development and Its Effect on Seed Quality

Jason Argyris, David Van Sanford and Dennis TeKrony*

Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Fusarium graminearum seed infection (closed symbols) and deoxynivalenol (DON) concentration (open symbols) during seed development of four wheat cultivars in 2000. DAA = days after anthesis; bars indicate ± SEM.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Visual ratings of (A) fusarium head blight (FHB) severity (Harvests 1 to 5) and (B) severely Fusarium-damaged seeds (Harvests 3 to 10) for four wheat cultivars during seed development in 2001. DAA = days after anthesis; bars indicate ± SEM.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Fusarium graminearum seed infection (closed symbols) and deoxynivalenol (DON) concentration (open symbols) during seed development for four wheat cultivars in 2001. DAA = days after anthesis; bars indicate ± SEM.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Standard germination of (A) untreated and (B) treated seeds of four wheat cultivars during seed development in 2001. DAA = days after anthesis; bars indicate ± SEM.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Relationship of standard germination to Fusarium graminearum seed infection in four wheat cultivars in 2001.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Wheat seed vigor as measured by accelerated aging germination (closed symbols) and electrical conductivity (open symbols) in four wheat cultivars at various stages of seed development in 2001. Arrows indicate date of physiological maturity (PM) for each cultivar. DAA = days after anthesis; bars indicate ± SEM.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Crop Science Society of America.