Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Stress
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Cell Biology & Molecular Genetics

Photosynthesis and Seed Production under Water-Deficit Conditions in Transgenic Tobacco Plants That Overexpress an Arabidopsis Ascorbate Peroxidase Gene

Juqiang Yan, Jing Wang, David Tissue, A. Scott Holaday, Randy Allen and Hong Zhang*

Dep. of Biological Sci., Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409, USA



View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Seed weight per plant (A) and fruit number per plant (B) of transgenic (Y3 and B3) and control plants (Xnn) after repeated cycles of water deficit and their well-watered controls. The letters A and B indicate significant difference at the 0.05 level.

 


View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Leaf water potential (A), photosynthesis (B), and stomatal conductance (C) of transgenic (Y3 and B3) and control plants (Xnn) expressed as ratios from random pairing of values of water-deficit and well-watered plants. For water-deficit treatment D1 through D5, plants were watered with 100, 75, 50, 25, and 0% of the water needed to fully replenish control plants, respectively. After withholding water for 5 d (2 d after D5), the water-deficient plants were rewatered extensively in the morning, and then gas exchange parameters were measured at 5 h (R0) and the next day (R1). Values are means ± SD, n = 8 for water-deficit treatment, n = 5 for recovery stages.

 


View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Aboveground biomass (A) and total leaf area (B) of transgenic (Y3 and B3) and control plants (Xnn) expressed as ratios from random pairing of values of water-deficient and well-watered plants. D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5 indicate plants watered with 100, 75, 50, 25, and 0% of water needed to fully replenish control plants, respectively. Every treatment lasted for 3 d and all parameters were measured on the third day. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Crop Science Society of America.