Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gustine, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Elwinger, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gustine, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Elwinger, G. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gustine, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Elwinger, G. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecosystem Management
Right arrow Plant Genetic Resources
Right arrow Statistics

Spatiotemporal Genetic Structure within White Clover Populations in Grazed Swards

David L. Gustine* and Gerald F. Elwinger

USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Curtin Road, Building 3702, University Park, PA 16802-3702



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Spatial autocorrelation correlogram of white clover populations at the JU site in 1997. The dashed lines delineate the 95% confidence intervals of the null distribution. N, number of samples; n, number of clones; nc, number of nonclonal samples; P, overall correlogram significance.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Spatial autocorrelation correlogram of white clover populations at the JU site in 1998. The dashed lines delineate the 95% confidence intervals of the null distribution. N, number of samples; n, number of clones; nc, number of nonclonal samples; P, overall correlogram significance.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Spatial autocorrelation correlogram of white clover populations at the MI site in 1997. The dashed lines delineate the 95% confidence intervals of the null distribution. N, number of samples; n, number of clones; nc, number of nonclonal samples; P, overall correlogram significance.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Spatial autocorrelation correlogram of white clover populations at the MI site in 1998. The dashed lines delineate the 95% confidence intervals of the null distribution. N, number of samples; n, number of clones; nc, number of nonclonal samples; P, overall correlogram significance.

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mean patch size found in white clover populations averaged over years, sites, and quadrats. Error bars represent ±SE; n values for May to September were 8, 6, 5, 5, and 8, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Crop Science Society of America.