Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Narayanan, N. N.
Right arrow Articles by Datta, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Narayanan, N. N.
Right arrow Articles by Datta, S. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Narayanan, N. N.
Right arrow Articles by Datta, S. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rice
Right arrow Plant Disease

Molecular Breeding for the Development of Blast and Bacterial Blight Resistance in Rice cv. IR50

N. N. Narayanana, N. Baisakha, C. M. Vera Cruza, S. S. Gnanamanickamb, K. Dattaa and S. K. Datta*,a

a Entomology and Plant Pathology Div., IRRI, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, The Philippines
b Center for Advanced Studies in Botany, Univ. of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai-600025, India



View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Phenotypic reaction of Piz-5 introgressed IR50 line against rice blast isolates C9240-5, IK81-3, and IK81-25.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Phenotypic evaluation of blast resistant IR50 containing the Piz-5 gene using three diagnostic strains following the procedure of Bonman et al., 1986.

 


View larger version (89K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The generation of sequence-specific amplicon polymorphism between resistant (C101A51) and susceptible (IR50) rice varieties for marker-aided selection. (A) Gel analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products before restriction digestion. (B) Gel analysis of PCR products after digestion with restriction enzyme HaeIII. Lanes 1 and 2 represent the susceptible parent IR50 and donor resistant line C101A51, respectively. The molecular weight of PCR products as banding patterns is indicated in kb (kilobases). M = Molecular weight marker (1-kb ladder).

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Evaluation of isogenic lines and gene stacked lines after 15 to 30 d with 5-d interval in the rice blast nursery at IRRI, The Philippines, based on the standard evaluation system of rice 15, 20, 25, and 30 d after inoculation.

 


View larger version (194K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Blast nursery showing higher infection in susceptible check (IR50) and less infection on isolines of IR50 with Piz-5 gene.

 


View larger version (111K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Bacterial blight reactions to (A) Race PXO61 and (B) PXO86 in IR24 (1), IRBB4 (2), and IR50 (3) to examine endogenous Xa-4 gene in rice cv. IR50.

 


View larger version (76K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of transgenic IR50 T0 Plants 13, 14, and 15 showing a 1.4-kilobase (marked with arrow) Xa-21-specific DNA fragment amplified by primers U1 and I1. M = molecular weight marker; Lanes 1, 2, and 3 represent nontransformed IR50, IRBB21, pC822, and transgenic IR50 Plants 13, 14, and 15, respectively.

 


View larger version (82K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Southern analysis of transgenic T0 plants. The arrow represents the expected 3.8-kilobase (kb) band corresponding to the Xa21 transgene. Lanes 1 to 5 represent nontransformed IR50, transgenic T0 IR50-13, 14, and 15, and plasmid pC822, respectively. Five- to 7-µg plant genomic DNA and 30 pg of plasmid DNA were digested with EcoRV. The 1.4-kb polymerase chain reaction amplified fragment of pC822 was labeled with {alpha}-[32P]-dCTP using the Rediprime Labeling Kit (Amersham Heights, IL) and was used as the hybridization probe.

 


View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Southern analysis of transgenic T1 plants. A total of 5 to 7 µg of plant genomic DNA and 30 pg of plasmid DNA were digested with EcoRV and hybridized with the same enzyme-digested plasmid DNA fragment. The arrow marks the expected 3.8-kilobase hybridizing band corresponding to Xa21 transgene in T0 and T1 plants. T0 = primary transgenic plant, T1 = selfed progenies of T13 (T0).

 


View larger version (68K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Reactions of transgenic T1 IR50 plants carrying Xa21 and Piz-5 introgressed for blast resistance when inoculated with IK81-3. Leaves 1 to 4 represent CO39, IR50, C101A51 (Piz-5), and transgenic IR50 (Piz-5 + Xa-21), respectively.

 


View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Resistant reactions of transgenic T1 IR50 plants introgressed with Xa-21 for bacterial blight resistance inoculated with Races (A) PXO99, (B) PXO86, and (C) PXO341. Leaves 1 to 5 represent IR24, IR50, IRBB4, IRBB21, and transgenic IR50 (T13) (Piz-5 + Xa-21), respectively, scored 14 d after inoculation.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Crop Science Society of America.