Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gesch, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Voorheees, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gesch, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Voorheees, W. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gesch, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Voorheees, W. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Crop Management
Right arrow Other Oil Crops

Yield and Growth Response of Cuphea to Sowing Date

Russ W. Gesch*,a, Frank Forcellaa, Nancy Barboura, Bliss Phillipsb and Ward B. Voorheeesa

a USDA-ARS, North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, Morris, MN 56267, USA
b USDA-ARS, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Peoria, IL 61604



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Response of Cuphea seed and seed oil yield to planting date in 1999 and 2000. Within each year, mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the P = 0.1 level.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Plant populations determined at harvest in 1999 and 2000. Within each year, mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the P = 0.1 level.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Soil temperatures at the 0.05 m depth from April through June in 1999 and 2000.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. (A) Height of Cuphea plants in 1999 as a function of growing degree days (°C d) accumulated from the time of emergence; values are the mean SD, n = 3. (B) Rate of height increase as a function of days after emergence. Regression lines are shown in B for data during linear growth phase; regression equations followed by a different letter are significantly different at the P < 0.05 level.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Crop Science Society of America.