HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Liu, X. Articles by Huang, B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Liu, X. Articles by Huang, B. Agricola Articles by Liu, X. Articles by Huang, B. Related Collections Turfgrass Management

Mowing Effects on Root Production, Growth, and Mortality of Creeping Bentgrass

Dep. of Plant Science, Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ 08901

View larger version (36K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Effects of mowing height on total root length of ‘Crenshaw’ and ‘Penncross’ in 1997 and 1998. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between mowing treatments (P = 0.05) at a given day of treatment.

View larger version (40K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Effects of mowing height on cumulative new root length of ‘Crenshaw’ and ‘Penncross’ in 1997 and 1998. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between mowing treatments (P = 0.05) at a given day of treatment.

View larger version (38K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Effects of mowing height on cumulative dead root length of ‘Crenshaw’ and ‘Penncross’ in 1997 and 1998. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between mowing treatments (P = 0.05) at a given day of treatment.

View larger version (38K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Effects of mowing height on ratios of dead/new roots in length of ‘Crenshaw’ and ‘Penncross’ in 1997 and 1998. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between mowing treatments (P = 0.05) at a given day of treatment.

View larger version (40K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Effects of mowing height on ratios of dead/new roots in number of ‘Crenshaw’ and ‘Penncross’ in 1997 and 1998. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between mowing treatments (P = 0.05) at a given day of treatment.

View larger version (39K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Effects of mowing height on root mortality in length of ‘Crenshaw’ and ‘Penncross’ in 1997 and 1998. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between mowing treatments (P = 0.05) at a given day of treatment.

View larger version (38K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Effects of mowing height on root mortality in number of ‘Crenshaw’ and ‘Penncross’ in 1997 and 1998. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between mowing treatments (P = 0.05) at a given day of treatment.

View larger version (28K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Effects of mowing height on maximum rooting depth of ‘Crenshaw’ and ‘Penncross’ in 1997 and 1998. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between mowing treatments (P = 0.05) at a given day of treatment.