Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de la Vega, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by de la Vega, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by de la Vega, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Cytology

Effects of Planting Date, Genotype, and Their Interactions on Sunflower Yield

II. Components of Oil Yield

Abelardo J. de la Vega* and Antonio J. Hall

IFEVA, Facultad de Agronoma, Universidad de Buenos Aires/CONICET, Av. San Martn 4453, (1417) Buenos Aires, Argentina



View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Relationships between oil yield and (A) grain number per square meter, (B) grain weight, and (C) grain oil concentration, for nine sunflower hybrids grown in October (S1) and December (S2) sowing dates at Venado Tuerto during 1996-1997 and 1998-1999. Values are means of the 2 yr. Dashed arrows highlight some contrasting genotypic responses to change from S1 to S2, and which underlie G x S interactions (Treatment 1, triangles; Treatment 9, circles). Genotype groups derived from cluster analysis of a multienvironment trial (de la Vega et al., 2001), i.e., G1: Northern adapted, G2: Central adapted, G3: broadly adapted. See Table 1 in de la Vega and Hall (2002) for genotype group membership.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Relationships between grain weight and (A) rate of grain filling, and (B) duration of grain filling, for nine sunflower hybrids grown in October (S1) and December (S2) sowing dates at Venado Tuerto during 1996-1997 and 1998-1999. For genotype groups (i.e., G1, G2, G3) see legend of Fig. 1.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Bilineal relationships between grain weight and time from full anthesis for Genotypes 1, 2, and 9 in October (S1) and December (S2) planting dates at Venado Tuerto, 1996-1997. Final grain weight and grain oil concentration values reached by those hybrids in those environments are superimposed. Error bars indicate standard deviations. See Table 1 for the genotype codes.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationships between grain oil concentration and (A) kernel percentage, and (B) duration of grain filling, for nine sunflower hybrids grown in October (S1) and December (S2) sowing dates at Venado Tuerto during 1996-1997 and 1998-1999. Dashed arrows highlight some contrasting genotypic responses to S2, which underlie G x S interactions (Treatment 1, Triangles; Treatment 9, circles). For genotype groups (i.e., G1, G2, G3) see legend of Fig. 1.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Crop Science Society of America.