Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borrás, L.
Right arrow Articles by Otegui, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Borrás, L.
Right arrow Articles by Otegui, M. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Borrás, L.
Right arrow Articles by Otegui, M. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Seed Quality

Maize Kernel Composition and Post-Flowering Source-Sink Ratio

Lucas Borrás*,a, José A. Curáb and María E. Oteguia

a Dep. de Producción Vegetal, Fac. de Agronomía, Univ. de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, Capital Federal (C1417DSE), Argentina
b Dep. de Biología Aplicada y Alimentos, Fac. de Agronomía, Univ. de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, Capital Federal (C1417DSE), Argentina



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Starch (A), protein (B) and oil (C) yield per plant for varying KNP values of hybrids DK664 and DK752 grown at the stand densities of 3 (LD) and 9 (HD) plants m-2. Parameters ± standard errors of the fitted linear and bilinear models are shown in the inserts of each figure with the corresponding symbols.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Starch (A), protein (B) and oil (C) content per kernel (mg kernel-1) in relation to kernel weight (KW; mg kernel-1) for hybrids DK664 and DK752. The gray dotted lines within each graphic show the concentration of the component as reference. Inserts within each figure show the parameters ± the standard error of the fitted linear and bilinear models.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Normalized protein, starch and oil variations in response to the post-flowering source-sink ratio of hybrids DK664 and DK752. Model parameters ± standard errors are shown in the insert. The post-flowering source-sink ratio was calculated as plant biomass increase per kernel during the effective grain-filling period (mg kernel-1).

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Response of starch, protein and oil concentration to variations in the post-flowering source-sink ratio of hybrids DK752 and DK664. Model parameters ± standard errors are shown in the insert. The post-flowering source-sink ratio was calculated as plant biomass increase per kernel during the effective grain-filling period (mg kernel-1).

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Residual stem N and soluble nonstructural carbohydrates (SNC) (mg kernel-1) at physiological maturity (PM) of hybrids DK664 and DK752 in response to the post-flowering source-sink ratio. Model parameters ± standard errors are shown in the insert. The post-flowering source-sink ratio was calculated as plant biomass increase per kernel during the effective grain-filling period (mg kernel-1).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Crop Science Society of America.