Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritala, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tammisola, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ritala, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tammisola, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ritala, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tammisola, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecological Risk Assessment

Measuring Gene Flow in the Cultivation of Transgenic Barley

A. Ritala*,a, A. M. Nuutilaa, R. Aikasalob, V. Kauppinena and J. Tammisolac

a VTT Biotechnology, P.O. Box 1500, FIN-02044-VTT, Finland
b Boreal Plant Breeding Ltd, Myllytie 8, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland
c Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, P.O. Box 30, FIN-00023 Government, Helsinki, Finland



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Experimental set-up of the field trials to measure gene flow from the transgenic barley at the Boreal Plant Breeding, Jokioinen, Finland, in 1996 and 1997. In the cultivation scale experiment, the distance of 100 m for the male-sterile recipient plots was included. The areas between the recipient lines and also the surrounding areas were planted with other plants than barley (see text).

 


View larger version (84K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Monitoring of transgenic barley volunteers the year after the field trial. The experimental set-up in the 1997 field trial plot.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The cross-fertilization frequencies of transgenic barley with male-sterile and male-fertile recipient plots at a distance of 1 m from the donor area in the cultivation scale experiment in 1997. The 95% confidence interval is indicated with line segments.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The proportion of nontransgenic seeds in male-sterile plots increased with distance. The flowers of male-sterile heads were mainly pollinated by nontransgenic background pollen. Such background pollen is to be expected from pollen leakage, i.e., because of occasional formation of pollen reported to occur in some male-sterile heads. The 95% confidence interval is indicated with line segments.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The seed-set in recipient male-sterile barley plots in the dominant wind direction of the cultivation scale experiment (2000 m2) at Boreal Plant Breeding, Jokioinen, Finland, in 1997. Full heads originating from escaped individuals with full seed-sets are not included in the numbers, because they constitute a strong biasing disorder in the male-sterile recipient line (see text). The bars indicate the mean plus and minus one standard error.

 


View larger version (139K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. PCR analysis of the seeds obtained from male-sterile heads. Lane 1, reagent blank; Lanes 2 and 3, nontransgenic seeds; Lanes 4 through 7, transgenic (nptII) seeds obtained from male-sterile heads; Lane 8, negative control (seed); Lane 9, positive control (nptII plasmid); Lane 10, molecular size standard ({lambda} DNA, digested with PstI).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Crop Science Society of America.