Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koning, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ghabrial, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koning, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ghabrial, S. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Koning, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ghabrial, S. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Plant Disease
Right arrow Seed Production

Infection of Soybean with Soybean mosaic virus Increases Susceptibility to Phomopsis spp. Seed Infection

Gwen Koninga, Dennis M. TeKrony*,a, Todd W. Pfeiffera and Said A. Ghabrialb

a Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
b Dep. of Plant Pathology, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546



View larger version (49K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effects of Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) (strain G2) infection at different stages of plant development on (a) SMV in seedcoats, and b) Phomopsis spp. seed infection, at different stages of seed maturation, 1995 to 1997. Averages across genotypes from apical seeds are shown in 1995, and averages of apical and basal seeds are shown in 1996 and 1997. Bars with different letters, within years and response variables, are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level. Variables in y-axis are not of the same magnitude. FS, full seed; YP, yellow pod; HM, harvest maturity; nd, not detected; R-NI, resistant isolines (L78-434, L78-379) not inoculated with SMV; S-NI, S-V4, S-V8 and S-R2, susceptible cultivars (Clark, Williams) not inoculated with SMV, or inoculated with SMV at V4, V8 or R2 growth stages.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Relationship between the incidence of Phomopsis spp. seed infection and the concentration of Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) antigen (strain G2) in seedcoats at yellow pod ({circ}) and harvest maturity ({blacktriangledown}) in a) 1996 (n = 60) and b) 1997 (n = 120). Data averaged across apical and basal seeds, and regressed across all the SMV-inoculation treatments received by two SMV-susceptible cultivars (Clark, Williams) and their SMV-resistant isolines (L78-434, L78-379).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.