Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Temperature Stress
Right arrow Turfgrass

Osmotic Adjustment and Root Growth Associated with Drought Preconditioning-Enhanced Heat Tolerance in Kentucky Bluegrass

Yiwei Jianga and Bingru Huang*,b

a Department of Horticulture, Forestry, and Recreational Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-5506
b Department of Plant Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Turf quality (A) and leaf relative water content (B) as affected by heat stress in drought-preconditioned and nonpreconditioned Kentucky bluegrass. Vertical bars indicate LSD values (P = 0.05) for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment. The dotted line indicates the acceptable level of turf quality (6).

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Osmotic adjustment as affected by heat stress in drought-preconditioned and nonpreconditioned Kentucky bluegrass. Means followed by the same letters within a column at a given day of heat stress treatment were not significantly different based on LSD test (P = 0.05).

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Leaf water soluble carbohydrate content (A) and proline content (B) as affected by heat stress in drought-preconditioned and nonpreconditioned Kentucky bluegrass. Vertical bars indicate LSD values (P = 0.05) for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.