Osmotic Adjustment and Root Growth Associated with Drought Preconditioning-Enhanced Heat Tolerance in Kentucky Bluegrass
Yiwei Jianga and
Bingru Huang*,b
a Department of Horticulture, Forestry, and Recreational Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-5506
b Department of Plant Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Turf quality (A) and leaf relative water content (B) as affected by heat stress in drought-preconditioned and nonpreconditioned Kentucky bluegrass. Vertical bars indicate LSD values (P = 0.05) for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment. The dotted line indicates the acceptable level of turf quality (6).
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Osmotic adjustment as affected by heat stress in drought-preconditioned and nonpreconditioned Kentucky bluegrass. Means followed by the same letters within a column at a given day of heat stress treatment were not significantly different based on LSD test (P = 0.05).
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Leaf water soluble carbohydrate content (A) and proline content (B) as affected by heat stress in drought-preconditioned and nonpreconditioned Kentucky bluegrass. Vertical bars indicate LSD values (P = 0.05) for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment.
|
|
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.