Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cober, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Voldeng, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cober, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Voldeng, H. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cober, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Voldeng, H. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Crop Genetics

Photoperiod and Temperature Responses in Early-Maturing, Near-Isogenic Soybean Lines

Elroy R. Cober*, Douglas W. Stewart and Harvey D. Voldeng

Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre (ECORC), Agric. & Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6



View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Sensitivity study on the critical photoperiod (PC) above which photoperiod extends the time to first flower. The standard error of estimate (SEE) of the model (Eq. [7]) fit to the data is plotted against PC. The solid line is Y = 51.41 - 7.128X + 0.2642X2 with a minimum at 13.5 h (R2 = 0.98).

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Days to first flower as a function of photoperiod at two temperatures (28 and 18°C) for five photoperiods and six isolines of soybean. Lines are model calculations. Error bars are standard errors of the mean. Photoperiods were 10, 12, 14, 16 and 20 h but some data are offset by plus or minus 0.2 h for clarity.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Observed versus calculated days to first flower. The solid line is the 1:1 line and the broken line is the regression, Y = 2.018 + 0.9542X with an r2 of 0.96.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The photoperiod-temperature interaction function (cT) as it varies with temperature for the six isolines.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Photoperiod sensitivities determined by the values of the photoperiod coefficients (c), as a function of the number of dominant alleles. The regression (solid line) is Y = -0.002138 - 0.0008123X with an r2 of 0.90.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.