Discovery and Deployment of Molecular Markers Linked to Fusarium Head Blight Resistance
An Integrated System for Wheat and Barley
David Van Sanford*a,
James Andersonb,
Kimberly Campbellc,
Josè Costad,
Perry Cregane,
Carl Griffeyf,
Patrick Hayesg and
Richard Wardh
a Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091
b Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
c USDA-ARS, Pullman, WA 99164
d NRSL Dep., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
e USDA-ARS, Soybean and Alfalfa Research Lab., Beltsville, MD 20705
f Dep. of Crop & Soil Env. Sciences, Virginia Tech Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
g Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
h Crop and Soil Sciences Dep., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824

View larger version (54K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Relative cost effectiveness of marker based selection (MBS) compared to selection based on resistance phenotype, given marker costs of $0.50 (A). $2.00 (B), $3.00 (C), and $5.00 (D) per marker data point and a fixed cost of $6.00 per phenotype data point.
|
|

View larger version (77K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Process flow diagram of gene discovery, annotation, and deployment. Boxes with lighter shading represent activities to be carried out at the National Genotyping Center.
|
|
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.