Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stier, J.C.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, J.N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stier, J.C.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, J.N., III
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stier, J.C.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, J.N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Turfgrass
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Plant Nutrition

Trinexapac-Ethyl and Iron Effects on Supina and Kentucky Bluegrasses Under Low Irradiance

J.C. Stiera and J.N. Rogers, IIIb

a Dep. of Horticulture, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1590
b III, Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824-1325



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Interaction of trinexapac-ethyl (TE) and species on turf quality in reduced-irradiance conditions during 1994–1995 (a) and 1995–1996 (b), East Lansing, MI. Quality was rated visually on a one-to-nine scale: 1 = 100% dead turf/bare soil; 9 = dense, uniform turf; 5 was the minimum value for acceptable athletic field turf. LSD values are for comparing within or between species or TE levels

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Interaction of trinexapac-ethyl (TE) and species on quality of turf subjected to traffic in reduced-irradiance conditions during 1994–1995 (a) and 1995–1996 (b), East Lansing, MI. Quality was rated visually on a one-to-nine scale: 1 = 100% dead turf/bare soil; 9 = dense, uniform turf; 5 was the minimum value for acceptable athletic field turf. LSD values are for comparing within or between species or TE levels. Plots were installed inside the Covered Stadium Simulator Facility (CSSF) on 12 Dec. 1994 and 8 Dec. 1995. Traffic was applied by a person wearing soccer cleats who jogged across the turf 50 passes weekly from 28 Dec. 1994 (2 wk after installation) to 16 March 1995 (600 passes) and 26 Jan. 1996 (7 wk after installation) to 26 April 1996 (700 passes)

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.