Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anis-ur-Rehman,
Right arrow Articles by Isleib, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Anis-ur-Rehman,
Right arrow Articles by Isleib, T. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Anis-ur-Rehman,
Right arrow Articles by Isleib, T. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Seed Production

Reproductive Allocation on Branches of Virginia-Type Peanut Cultivars Bred for Yield in North Carolina

Anis-ur-Rehmana, Randy Wellsa,b and Thomas G. Isleiba,b

a A.U. Rehman, 602, 70-Parkwood Village Dr., North York M3A 2X7 ON, Canada
b Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620



View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The relationship of (A) yield, (B) reproductive-to-vegetative ratio (RVR) of n + 2 branch number, and (C) RVR of n + 1 branch number to the maximum number of breeding cycles of hybridization and selection back to an indigenous peanut line. Symbols represent genotype means across year and location (n = 8)

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The relationship of peanut reproductive-to-vegetative ratio for dry weight of the (A) total stem, (B) cotyledonary branch, and (C) n + 1 branch to the maximum number of breeding cycles of hybridization and selection back to an indigenous peanut line. Leaves were not included in the vegetative DW. Symbols represent genotype means across year and location (n = 8)

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The relationship between peanut reproductive-to-vegetative ratio for dry weight of the (A) n + 1 branch number, (B) n + 1 branch DW, and (C) total stem DW to yield. Leaves were not included in the vegetative DW. Symbols represent breeding cycle (maximum breeding cycles of hybridization and selection back to and indigenous peanut line) means across year and location (n = 8, 16, 24, 24, and 8 for BC = 0, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively)

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The relationship between peanut reproductive-to-vegetative ratio for dry weight (DW) of the (A) n + 1 branch number, (B) cotyledonary branch DW, (C) n + 1 branch DW, and (D) total stem DW to year-of-cultivar release. Leaves were not included in the vegetative DW. Symbols represent year-of-cultivar release means across year and location

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The relationship between peanut reproductive-to-vegetative ratio (RVR) for dry weight of the (A) cotyledonary branch DW, (B) n + 1 branch DW, and (C) total stem DW to RVR for n + 1 branch number. Leaves were not included in the vegetative DW. Symbols represent genotype means across year and location

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.