Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Xu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Xu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Turfgrass Management
Right arrow Temperature Stress
Right arrow Turfgrass

Morphological and Physiological Characteristics Associated with Heat Tolerance in Creeping Bentgrass

Qingzhang Xu and Bingru Huang

Dep. of Horticulture, Forestry, and Recreation Resources, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-5506



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The responses of turf quality for L-93 and Penncross to high temperature. Vertical bars indicate LSDs (P = 0.05) for treatment and cultivar comparisons at a given day of treatment

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The responses of canopy photosynthetic rate (Pn) for L-93 and Penncross to high temperature. Vertical bars indicate LSDs (P = 0.05) for treatment and cultivar comparisons at a given day of treatment

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The responses of single-leaf photosynthetic rate (Pn) for L-93 and Penncross to high temperature. Vertical bars indicate LSDs (P = 0.05) for treatment and cultivar comparisons at a given day of treatment

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The responses of RuBP carboxylase (Rubisco) activity for L-93 and Penncross to high temperature. Vertical bars indicate LSDs (P = 0.05) for treatment and cultivar comparisons at a given day of treatment

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The responses of plant density for L-93 and Penncross to high temperature. Vertical bars indicate LSDs (P = 0.05) for treatment and cultivar comparisons at a given day of treatment

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The responses of tiller density for L-93 and Penncross to high temperature. Vertical bars indicate LSDs (P = 0.05) for treatment and cultivar comparisons at a given day of treatment

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. The responses of root number for L-93 and Penncross to high temperature. Vertical bars indicate LSDs (P = 0.05) for treatment and cultivar comparisons at a given day of treatment

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. The responses of root fresh weight for L-93 and Penncross at different soil depths to high temperature. Vertical bars indicate LSDs (P = 0.05) for treatment and cultivar comparisons at a given day of treatment

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. The responses of specific root length for L-93 and Penncross to high temperatures. Vertical bars indicate LSDs (P = 0.05) for treatment and cultivar comparisons at a given day of treatment

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. The responses of root to tiller number ratio (R/T) for L-93 and Penncross to high temperature. Vertical bars indicate LSDs (P = 0.05) for treatment and cultivar comparisons at a given day of treatment

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.