Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (33)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Xu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Xu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, B.

Growth and Physiological Responses of Creeping Bentgrass to Changes in Air and Soil Temperatures

Qingzhang Xu and Bingru Huang

Dep. of Horticulture, Forestry, and Recreation Resources, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-5506 USA



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Temperature profiles in soil and air under four differential air/soil temperature regimes. Data points represent an average (± standard error) of four replicates. Standard errors that are not shown are small and covered by the symbols

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Turf quality responses to differential air/soil temperatures. Vertical bars on the top indicate LSD for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment. Vertical bars on the right indicate LSD for comparisons of changes over treatment duration within a treatment

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Canopy photosynthetic rate responses to differential air/soil temperatures. Vertical bars on the top indicate LSD for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment. Vertical bars on the right indicate LSD for comparisons of changes over treatment duration within a treatment

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Diurnal changes of canopy photosynthetic rate under four differential air/soil temperature regimes. Vertical bars on the top indicate LSD for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment. Vertical bars on the right indicate LSD for comparisons of changes over time within a treatment

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5 Canopy photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) responses to differential air/soil temperatures. Vertical bars on the top indicate LSD for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment. Vertical bars on the right indicate LSD for comparisons of changes over treatment within a treatment

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6 Root fresh weight responses to differential air/soil temperatures. Vertical bars on the top indicate LSD for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment. Vertical bars on the right indicate LSD for comparisons of changes over treatment duration within a treatment

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7 Relative root number at different soil depths in response to differential air/soil temperatures. Vertical bars on the top indicate LSD for treatment comparisons at a given day of treatment for a given soil depth. Vertical bars on the right indicate LSD for comparisons of changes over treatment duration within a treatment

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.