Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brégard, A.
Right arrow Articles by Michaud, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brégard, A.
Right arrow Articles by Michaud, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brégard, A.
Right arrow Articles by Michaud, R.

Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Morphological Characteristics of Timothy Populations Selected for Low and High Forage Nitrogen Concentrations

A. Brégarda, G. Bélangera and R. Michauda

a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Bd., Sainte-Foy, QC, G1V 2J3, Canada. Contribution no. 639 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Nitrogen accumulation as a function of total biomass and forage DM yield of timothy populations selected for high (N+) and low (N-) forage N concentration and of a check (`Champ'). In the first regrowth cycle (Phase 1), data were obtained under one N rate. In the second regrowth cycle (Phase 2), data for each N rate are joined by dotted lines, and the four N rates are indicated. Standard errors of the mean are presented as horizontal bars to compare population DM yields, and as vertical bars to compare population N accumulations

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Nitrate N, and soluble and insoluble N in forage of timothy populations selected for high (N+) and low (N-) forage N concentration and of a check (champ). grown under limiting to nonlimiting N rates during the second regrowth cycle (Phase 2). In the first regrowth cycle (Phase 1), data were obtained under one N rate. Standard errors of the mean are presented as vertical bars

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Root to total biomass ratios for DM yield and N accumulation, leaf weight ratio (LWR), and leaf N accumulation ratio of timothy populations selected for high (N+) and low (N-) forage N concentration and of a check (`Champ') grown under limiting to nonlimiting N rates in the second regrowth cycle (Phase 2). In the first regrowth cycle (Phase 1), data were obtained under one N rate. Standard errors of the mean are presented as vertical bars

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Specific leaf area (SLA), tiller number, and leaf elongation rate (LER) of timothy populations selected for high (N+) and low (N-) forage N concentration and of a check (`Champ') grown under limiting to nonlimiting N rates during the second regrowth cycle (Phase 2). Standard errors of the mean are presented as vertical bars

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.