Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferrufino, A.
Right arrow Articles by Carter, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ferrufino, A.
Right arrow Articles by Carter, T. E., Jr.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ferrufino, A.
Right arrow Articles by Carter, T. E.

Root Elongation of Soybean Genotypes in Response to Acidity Constraints in a Subsurface Solution Compartment

Armando Ferrufinoa, T.Jot Smythb, Daniel W. Israelb and Thomas E. Carter, Jr.c

a Programa de Apoyo a la Estrategia de Desarollo Alternativo (PRAEDAC), P.O. Box 2395, Cochabamba, Bolivia
b USDA-ARS Soil Science Dep., North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7619 USA
c USDA-ARS Crop Science Dep., North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620 USA



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Mean soybean tap root length as a function of time in subsurface solution Al treatments maintained at pH values of (a) 4.2 and (b) 5.2 in Exp. 1. Symbols are observed values averaged across genotypes Ransom and PI, and lines are predicted values from polynomial regression models. Vertical bar denotes least significant difference (P < 0.05) for the pH by Al by time interaction

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Total soybean root length and length of individual root classes at harvest in subsurface solution pH and Al treatments in Exp. 1. Root length is averaged across genotypes Ransom and PI. Vertical bar denotes the least significant difference (P < 0.05) for total root length

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Number of lateral roots on tap roots at harvest in the subsurface compartment for soybean genotypes N93 (N), Ransom (R), PI, and Young (Y), as a function of Al concentration in solutions with 2 and 10 mM Ca in Exp. 2. Vertical bar denotes the least significant difference (P < 0.05) for the genotype x Al x Ca interaction

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Total root length at harvest as a function of root classes and solution Al and Ca treatments in the subsurface compartment for soybean genotypes N93 (N), Ransom (R), PI, and Young (Y) in Exp. 2. Vertical bar denotes least significant difference (P < 0.05) for the genotype x Al x Ca interaction

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5 Observed (symbols) and predicted (lines) relative length at harvest of (a) tap roots and (b) lateral roots of soybean genotypes N93, Ransom, PI, and Young in the subsurface solution compartment as a function of the molar activity ratios between Ca and Al3+ in Exp. 2. Prediction equations are shown in Table 8

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.