Efficiency of the Use of Doubled-Haploids in Recurrent Selection for Combining Ability
A. Boucheza and
A. Gallaisb,c
a INRA-UPS-INA.PG, Station de Génétique Végétale, Ferme du Moulon, 91190 Gif Sur Yvette, France
b INA.PG, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75321 Paris Cedex 05, France
c INRA-UPS-INA.PG, Station de Génétique Végétale, Ferme du Moulon, 91190 Gif Sur Yvette, France
View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1 Genetic advance per year (in genetic standard deviations) as a function of S0 heritability under different recurrent selection methods, when no off-season is used (with same selection rate
)
|
|
View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2 Genetic advance per year (in genetic standard deviations) as a function of S0 heritability under different recurrent selection methods, with use of off-season (with same selection rate
)
|
|
View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3 Domains of efficiency for SDHT compared with S0T, S1T and S2T, according to relative cycle length (ratio of the SDHT length to the length of the compared method), and to S0 plot-heritability with (same selection intensity)
|
|
View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4 Domains of efficiency for S1T compared with S0T, S2T and SDHT, according to relative cycle length (ratio of the S1T length to the length of the compared method), and to S0 plot-heritability (same selection intensity). (a) S1T > S2T and S1T < SDHT
|
|
View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5 Genetic advance per cycle (in genetic standard deviations) as a function of the number of replications of selection units, for the same number of intercrossed plants, with the same selection intensity (
for design without replication) and with S0 plot-heritability = 0.2
|
|
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.
