Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 39:1792-1797 (1999)
© 1999 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karamanos, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Papatheohari, A.Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Karamanos, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Papatheohari, A.Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Karamanos, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Papatheohari, A.Y.

Assessment of Drought Resistance of Crop Genotypes by Means of the Water Potential Index

A.J. Karamanosa and A.Y. Papatheoharia

a Lab. of Crop Production, Agricultural Univ. of Athens 75, Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 The time course of leaf water potential ({Psi}) for the wheat cultivar Yecora grown under rainfed conditions during the 1984-1985 season. The shaded area represents the water potential duration (WPD), and the vertical bars the standard errors of the means

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 The fitted linear regressions between grain yields and water potential index (WPI) for the bread wheat cultivars Yecora, Siette Cerros, and Generoso. The points represent results from each plot. Data for both seasons (1984-1985 and 1985-1986) are included

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 The fitted linear regressions between seed yields and water potential index (WPI) for the faba bean cultivars VT-1, FLIP-86, Brocal, KY-188, and R29-T. The points represent results from each plot. Data for the three seasons (1988-1989, 1989-1990, and 1990-1991) are included

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 The fitted linear regressions between yields and WPI for the wheat cultivar Yecora (squares) and the faba bean cultivar KY-188 (circles). The data for the different seasons are shown [first season, open symbols; second season, filled symbols; third season (in faba beans only), half-filled symbols]. No marked deviations from the fitted lines among seasons are observed

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5 Representation of the regression lines between yields and WPI for four hypothetical cultivars exhibiting different behavior under drought. 1: high potential yield, high adaptability. 2: high potential yield, low adaptability. 3: low potential yield, high adaptability. 4: low potential yield, low adaptability

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the Crop Science Society of America.