Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 39:1597-1604 (1999)
© 1999 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (87)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tollenaar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tollenaar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tollenaar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, J.

Yield Improvement in Temperate Maize is Attributable to Greater Stress Tolerance

M. Tollenaara and J. Wua

a Dept. of Plant Agriculture, Crop Science Division, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Mean maize grain yield (0% moisture) in Ontario from 1892 to 1997, from Agriculture Statistics for Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Queen's Printer of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 (A) Grain yield and (B) coefficient of variation (CV) for individual plant grain yield of an older (Pride 5) and a newer (Pioneer 3902) maize hybrid grown at two plant population densities and two levels of stand uniformity at Elora, Ontario in 1997. Values are means of four replications. Capped bars show standard error

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 The relationship between grain yield per unit area and coefficient of variation for individual plant grain yield at physiological maturity for six maize hybrids grown in four environments. Data points include four hybrids at 11 plants m-2 at Cambridge, Ontario in 1996; six hybrids at 7.0 plants m-2 at two soil nitrogen levels at Cambridge, Ontario in 1996; 11 plants m-2 at Cambridge, Ontario in 1997; and two hybrids at 11 plants m-2 at Elora, Ontario in 1997. The hybrids Pride 5, Warwick 263, Pioneer 3902, and NK 2555 were used in the test at Cambridge in 1996 and 1997; PAG SX111 and Pioneer 3893 were included at Cambridge in 1997. Pride 5 and Pioneer 3902 were used for the test at Elora, and CV values were taken from four replications for each hybrid

 


View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Grain yield comparison between uniform and nonuniform stands. (A) Grain yield of United 106 and Pride 116 in pure stands and their mixtures of different proportions (7:1, 6:2, 5:3, 4:4, 3:5, 2:6, 1:7) at three plant population densities at Elora in 1978 and 1979. Data from Hoekstra (1981). (B) Grain yield of uniformly sown stands and non-uniformly sown (50% plants sowed 7 d earlier and 50% plants sowed 7 d later relative to uniform stands) stands at four plant population densities averaged over 5 yr in Minnesota. Data from Ford and Hicks (1992)

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the Crop Science Society of America.