Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 39:1456-1463 (1999)
© 1999 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Köhler, H.
Right arrow Articles by Friedt, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Köhler, H.
Right arrow Articles by Friedt, W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Köhler, H.
Right arrow Articles by Friedt, W.

Genetic Variability as Identified by AP-PCR and Reaction to Mid-Stem Infection of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum among Interspecific Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Hybrid Progenies

H. Köhlera and W. Friedta

a Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding I, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment Preservation, Justus-Liebig-University, Ludwigstr. 23, D-35390 Giessen, Germany



View larger version (76K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Genotypic reaction of sunflower interspecific progenies to Sclerotinia after artificial mid-stem inoculation. Data shown as the extension of stem lesions (cm) determined the last scoring date. Interspecific genotypes that showed a significantly lower average level of Sclerotinia infection than Frankasol (# 14) are represented by black bars. For description of the genotypes see Table 1

 


View larger version (168K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 AP-PCR fingerprint of interspecific progenies (H. annuus x H. tuberosus); PCR carried out with the primer AP17. Lanes 2, 3: parents of the interspecific cross (HA89cms, H. tuberosus1705). Lanes 4 through 17: interspecific progenies that were backcrossed to H. annuus twice and self-pollinated three times (BC2S3). Lanes 1 and 18: 100-bp ladder (Gibco BRL, Life Science Technology)

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Dendrogram generated from AP-PCR data determined by the unweighted pair group method of arithmetic means (UPGMA). Data of seven wild Helianthus species, two sunflower inbred lines, three sunflower commercial hybrids, and 29 interspecific progenies (#2–6, 8–13 and 15–36; the wild species that were used for the initial crosses are noted in parenthesis) were analyzed. The scale is based on Nei and Li's coefficient of similarity

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the Crop Science Society of America.