Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 9:716-719 (1969)
© 1969 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horrocks, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Washko, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Horrocks, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Washko, J. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Horrocks, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Washko, J. B.

Spring Growth of Reed Canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) and Climax Timothy (Phleum pratense L.) Under Different Harvesting Systems1

R. D. Horrocks and J. B. Washko2

During the spring of 1965 and again in 1966 measurements were recorded at 2- to 4-day intervals on the growth rate of reed canarygrass and ‘Climax’ timothy as influenced by the residual effect of the previous year's treatments. The 1965 results of these treatments were: reed canarygrass — significantly lower rate of growth when clipped at the 4-cm vs 9-cm height; Climax timothy — no significant difference. The growth measurements recorded in the spring of 1966 reflected the residual influence on spring growth of clipping height as it interacted with plant maturity at the first harvest. Comparing the 4- and 9-cm clipping heights over the maturity stages showed the following: reed canarygrass — slower growh rate at 4- than at 9-cm heights if the first harvest was removed when the growing point was 5, 10 or 20 cm above the soil (Systems 1,2, and 3), but no difference if 30 cm above the soil or heads had emerged (Systems 4 and 5); Climax timothy — slower growth rate at the 9-cm height it the first harvest was removed under Systems 2 or 3, but not under the other systems. Considering only the residual effect of the stage of maturity at which the first harvest was removed, harvesting under System 2 was detrimental to growth of reed canarygrass. No significant effect of management system on growth rate was noted for Climax timothy.

Key Words: Perennial grasses • Growth rate • Clipipng height • Stage of maturity


1 Authorized for publication on October 4, 1968 as Paper No. 3485 in the Journal series of the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station. This paper is part of a Ph.D. thesis submitted by the senior author to The Pennsylvania State University.

2 Formerly Graduate Assistant (now Assistant Professor of Agronomy at the University of Missouri at Columbia, 65201) and Professor of Agronomy at The Pennsylvania State University.

Received for publication November 23, 1968.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1969 by the Crop Science Society of America.