Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 9:586-588 (1969)
© 1969 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stoker, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stoker, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, W. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stoker, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, W. G.

Effects of Loose Smut Infection and Vitavax Seed Treatment on Barley Yields1

G. L. Stoker and W. G. Dewey2

The effect of loose smut caused by Ustilago nuda (Jens.) Rostr. on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) yields, its control by Vitavax, and the possible direct effect of Vitavax on yields were studied with 10 seedlots of ‘Gem’ barley ranging in infection from .03 to 22%.

Yield losses were roughly proportional to percent infection; however, there was a tendency for percent infection to exceed percent yield loss at the higher smut levels. The percentage of loose smut in each of the 10 seedlots was determined by means of the embryo test, as well as by a corresponding field planting. The embryo test appeared to be a good, although a slightly conservative, predictor of field infection.

Seed treatment with Vitavax gave 100% control of loose smut over the range of infection tested. The beneficial effect of Vitavax in controlling loose smut was partially offset by an apparent direct adverse effect on yield. At very low levels of infection the yield reduction due to Vitavax treatment exceeded the benefit derived from the smut control. As infection levels rose above 5%, Vitavax treatment increased yields; however this increase did not reach statistical significance until loose smut levels approached 20%. Vitavax-treated plots had significantly fewer tillers than did untreated plots.

Key Words: Hordeum vulgare • Embryo test • Disease control • Seed infection • Systemic fungicides


1 Contribution from the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84321. Published with the approval of the Director as Journal Article No. 869.

Vitavax is UNIROYAL, Inc.'s trade name for 75% 2,3-dihydro-5-carboxanilido-6-methyl-l,4-oxathiin.

2 Associate Professor and Professor of Agronomy, Department of Plant Science, Utah State University.

Received for publication February 8, 1969.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1969 by the Crop Science Society of America.