Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 9:443-446 (1969)
© 1969 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, C. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, C. E.

Self-Compatibility Studies with Diploid Alsike Clover, Trifolium hybridum L. IV. Inheritance of Type II Self-Compatibility in Different Genetic Backgrounds1

C. E. Townsend2

Inheritance of a type of self-compatibility, possessing sporophytic and gametophytic characteristics, was studied in different genotypes of diploid alsike clover, Trifolium hybridum L. This type of self-compatibility was referred to as Type II. The original hypothesis stated that the A1 allele of the A locus in a heterozygous condition suppressed the action of only the S1 allele of the S locus in the pollen to give self-compatibility. Results from a series of crosses between self-compatible (SC) and self-incompatible (SI) plants showed that this postulate must be modified. In some crosses, the A1 allele was found to suppress the action of other S alleles. In other crosses the A1 allele did not suppress the action of any S alleles because all F1 plants were SI. When four of these SI F1 plants were backcrossed to a SC plant, only two of the 46 backcross plants were SC. Thus, the action of the A1 allele was variable. The number of SI and SC plants obtained in some progenies agreed with those expected according to the hypothesis that the A1 allele suppressed the action of only the S1 allele. The frequency of SI and SC plants from two F1 progenies with the same SC male parentage, differed from the frequency obtained in the progenies of the reciprocal crosses. The reason for the discrepancy is not known. In general, the deviation of the results obtained from those expected, and the complete absence of SC plants in some progenies, can be explained by the presence of modifying genes. Consequently, genetic background had considerable influence on the expression of Type II self-compatibility.

Key Words: Self-incompatibility • Sterility alleles


1 Joint contribution of the Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture and the Colorado Agr. Exp. Sta., Fort Collins, Colorado 80521. Scientific Series No. 1365.

2 Research Geneticist, Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture and Faculty Affiliate, Department of Agronomy, Colorado State University.

Received for publication November 4, 1968.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
K. MATSUI, T. NISHIO, and T. TETSUKA
Genes Outside the S Supergene Suppress S Functions in Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum)
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2004; 94(6): 805 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1969 by the Crop Science Society of America.