Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 9:276-279 (1969)
© 1969 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gritton, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gritton, E. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gritton, E. T.

Comparison of Planting Arrangements and Time of Evaluation for Peas (Pisum sativum L.)1

Earl T. Gritton2

Eight cultivars of processing peas (Pisum sativum L.) were grown under both nursery and commercial conditions during 1965 and 1966. They were evaluated for yield and other characters at the normal green pea processing stage and at the mature plant dry seed stage. The relationship between values measured under the two different planting arrangements and at the two tunes of harvest were examined through simple correlation coefficients and analyses of variance. Values obtained under nursery conditions for plant height, total number of nodes, lowest pod node, and number of ovule initials per pod were highly correlated with values obtained under commercial growing conditions. Large and highly significant "r" values were likewise obtained for these same traits when the comparison was between the normal processing stage and the dry seed stage. Yield per plot, pods per plant, and peas per pod were not consistently correlated between planting arrangements nor between tunes of harvest. Significant variety x planting arrangement and variety x harvest interactions indicate that some cultivars differed markedly for some characters from the general similarities of performance. Too much reliance upon evaluations made under nursery conditions, or at the mature plant stage, would results in misclassification of these cultivars relative to their performance under normal processing renditions.

Key Words: Correlation • Slection • Cultivar evaluation


1 Contribution from the Department of Agronomy. Published with the approval of the Director of the Research Division, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, 53706.

2 Assistant Professor of Agronomy, Wisconsin Agr. Exp. Sta.

Received for publication March 19, 1969.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1969 by the Crop Science Society of America.