Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 8:750-753 (1968)
© 1968 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Omran, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Atkins, I. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Omran, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Atkins, I. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Omran, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Atkins, I. M.

Heritability of Seedling Disease Characteristics in Flax1

Abbas O. Omran, R. A. Frederiksen and I. M. Atkins2

Resistance to seedling disease in the field (two locations) and resistance to two specific isolates of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn were studied using unselected progenies of F2 plants in the F3 and F4 generations of the flax cross ‘DeOro’ x ‘Dillman.’ There was a high level of dominance deviations towards resistance before and after germination. From 28.1 to 59.8% of the plants were susceptible before emergence and about 20% more after emergence. Heritability estimates in the broad sense ranged from .53 to .88 for preemergence resistance, and from .20 to .87 for postemergence resistance. In the narrow sense, heritability estimates ranged from .10 to .54 for preemergence resistance, and from .07 to .49 for postemergence resistance. Regression of F4 on F3 gave heritability estimates of .01 in the field, but .51 and .54 for the laboratory isolates for preemergence resistance. For postemergence resistance the regression was .05 in the field, while it was .08 and .27 in the laboratory. Genetic gains by selection were expected (and actually observed) in the laboratory tests, but no gain was expected or observed from the field tests. Genetic correlations existed between field and laboratory reactions, suggesting that it is possible to effectively select in the controlled environment of the laboratory for field improvement. Yellow-seeded families were much more susceptible than brown-seeded ones. Genetic gain for resistance to the less virulent isolate was greater than was gain for resistance to the more virulent one.

Key Words: Disease Resistance • Rhizoctania SolaniLinum Usitatissimum • Damping-off


1 A contribution of the Texas Agr. Exp. Sta. T.A. 7195. The results reported herein were compiled by the Senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree at Texas A&M University, College Station 77843.

2 Respectively: Graduate Student, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences (Now Research Agronomist, Department of Agriculture, Giza, United Arab Republic); Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Sciences; and Professor, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University.

Received for publication May 4, 1968.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1968 by the Crop Science Society of America.