Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 8:585-588 (1968)
© 1968 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Torrie, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lin, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Torrie, J. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lin, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Torrie, J. H.

Effect of Plant Spacing Within a Row on the Competitive Ability of Soybean Genotypes

C. S. Lin and J. H. Torrie2

Intra-row intergenotypic competition among two sets of three soybeans (Glycine max L. Merrill) genotypes were compared in pure stands and in mixtures using 10-, 20-, 41-, and 81-cm spacings between plants. Differences among genotypes for plant height and maturity were considerably greater in set I than in set 2. Competition effects were less for set I under the unfavorable enviromnent of 1964 and greater under the more favorable environment of 1965, while the reverse occurred for set 2. In both years, competition effects in set 1 were mostly additive. In set 2, competition effects were non-additive in 1964, a decrease in yield, height, number of branches, nodes and pods per plant occurring in mixtures as compared with pure stands. In 1965, competition effects were additive for most characters except seed weight and seeds per pod, where the non-additive effects were positive and negative, respectively. The magnitude of competition effects at different spacings was somewhat erratic. In general, competition effect increased as the distance between plants decreased in set 2. In set 1, competition effect increased as plant spacing increased from 5 to 20 cm in 1964 and from 5 to l0 cm in 1965; thereafter it decreased. At the 81 cm spacing no competition effect occurred for yield.


1 Contribution from the Department of Agronomy, Wisconsin Agr. Exp. Sta., Madison, Wis. 53706. Part of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of requirements for the Ph.D. degree.

2 Formerly graduate assistant (now Research Scientist, Statistical Research Service, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa) and Professor of Agronomy, Wisconsin Agr. Exp. Sta.

Received for publication January 12, 1968.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1968 by the Crop Science Society of America.