Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 8:529-532 (1968)
© 1968 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Eryani, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by El-Eryani, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, A. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by El-Eryani, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, A. A.

Differences in Free Amino Acids Between Stocks of the Same Long-Time Inbred Line of Maize (Zea mays L.)1

A. A. El-Eryani and A. A. Fleming2

Qualitative analysis was made for free amino acids by two-dimensional descending paper chromatography in four stocks of long-time corn inbred CI 7 (Zea mays L.).

We detected eight amino acids in 60 lambdas of the North Carolina and Arkansas sources, whereas only four were found in the stocks from Athens and Beltsville. However, seven amino acids were detected in 100 lambdas of the Athens and Beltsville stocks. Apparently, the North Carolina and Arkansas stocks differ quantitatively, rather than qualitatively, from the Athens and Beltsville stocks with respect to the free amino acids—asparagine, glutamine, glycine, and probably arginine. These findings are in agreement with a previous report by us on variations between these stocks for seedling and quantitative biochemical characters.

Stocks within supposedly homozygous lines may differ in the number and/or amount of amino acids present in the seedlings. Thus biochemical analyses may become more useful as techniques in the identification and isolation of genotypes in breeding programs and in basic genetic and cytogenetic studies.

These variations may be due either to mutation or residual heterozygosis, or to both. The possibility of episomal systems or regulatory genes as a part of mutation or residual heterozygosis should not be overlooked.

Key Words: biochemical analyses • breeding • chromatography • mutation • residual heterozygosity • episomal systems • regulatory genes


1 Contribution from the Department of Plant Pathology and Plant Genetics, College Experiment Station, University of Georgia, Athens 30601. Published with approval of the Director as Journal Paper No. 455. Part of a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the M.S. degree, 1964.

2 Graduate Assistant (now at Yale University) and Professor of Plant Genetics. The writers wish to express their thanks to the following for their help and suggestions in this investigation: L. S. Dure, III, M. K. Hamdy, S. J. Rowan, J. A. Veech, K. E. Papa, and J. S. Boyce, Jr., University of Georgia.

Received for publication October 2, 1967.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1968 by the Crop Science Society of America.