Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 7:571-574 (1967)
© 1967 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Addicott, F. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Addicott, F. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Addicott, F. T.

Boll Retention in Relation to Leaf and Boll Development in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)1

R. E. Johnson and F. T. Addicott2

The effect of leaf area and gibberellic acid (GA) boll retention was studied on cotton plants growing in nutrient culture. Leaf area was reduced to approximately half the control by two methods of leaf clipping, and two concentrations of GA were applied to all flowers.

In control plants, the ratio of leaves to retained bolls was initially high. It declined to approximately three at midseason, and thereafter remained constant to the end of the fruiting period. After adjustments for differences in leaf size, ratios for partially defoliated plants were similar to those of the control. Percent boll retention paralleled leaf-boll ratios.

Seed cotton yield and percent retention were significantly reduced in the partially defoliated treatments; however, no differences were found when seed cotton yield was expressed as a function of maximumle af area developed. There were no differences between the GA treatments and control for any of the characters measured. That retention was not increased by treating all the flowers contrasts with results obtained when only a few flowers or young bolls were treated.

The number of seeds per retained boll for all treatments was low initially, increasing to a maximum at the time of greatest shedding. This may indicate that a high seed complement is required for a boll to be retained when competition for assimilate occurs.

The results are interpreted as supporting the view that boll retention depends on the presence of a sufficient number of developing seeds to mobilize the assimilates required for contiuued growth, and upon the availability of assimilates as governed by the vegetative-reproductive status of the plant.

Key Words: leaf area • boll abscission • gibberellic acid • vegetative-reproductive interactions • fruiting efficiency


1 Contribution of the Agronomy Department, University of California, Davis.

2 Assistant Specialist and Professor of Agronomy, Davis, Calif.

Received for publication July 25, 1967.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1967 by the Crop Science Society of America.