Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 7:561-567 (1967)
© 1967 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cress, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cress, C. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cress, C. E.

Reciprocal Recurrent Selection and Modifications in Simulated Populations1

C. E. Cress2

Computer simulation was conducted by the Monte Carlo method for a bisexual organism with two allels at each of 40 independently segregating loci. Reciprocal recurrent selection and two modifications were performed for the completely dominant and purely overdominant models at a number of starting gene frequencies. Genetic divergence is an unsound basis for selecting starting populations when the goals of selection are long term. A short term increase in the means of the recurrent populations cannot be used as evidence for a predominance of partially or completely cominant gene effects.

Two modifications are important for the improvement of genetic potential and rate of progress for types of recurrent selection using progeny testing. 1) A synthetic variety should be made from all material entered into a moderate to long term recurrent selection program. 2) One generation of selling (or other inbreeding) should precede the test crosses in each cycle, where the progress per unit time indicates this is more efficient.


1 Journal Paper No. J-5513 of the Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames. Project 1448, supported by Grants 18093, 19218, and GB 6646 from the National Science Foundation. Part of a thesis submitted by the author in partial fulfillment of requirements for the Ph.D. degree.

2 Formerly Research Associate, statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University (now Assistant Professor, Department of Crop Science, Michigan State University).

Received for publication August 24, 1966.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. C. Reif, F.-M. Gumpert, S. Fischer, and A. E. Melchinger
Impact of Interpopulation Divergence on Additive and Dominance Variance in Hybrid Populations
Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1931 - 1934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1967 by the Crop Science Society of America.