Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 7:329-332 (1967)
© 1967 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burton, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lowrey, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burton, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lowrey, R. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Burton, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lowrey, R. S.

Improving Forage Quality in Bermudagrass by Breeding1

Glenn W. Burton, Richard H. Hart and R. S. Lowrey2

Twenty-three clones of bermudagrass, cut at 2-, 3-, 4-, and 6-week intervals, differed significantly in crude-protein content and nylon bag dry-matter digestibility. These quality measurements decreased as age of forage increased. Genotype x age interactions were not significant. F1 hybrid ‘Coastal’ x ‘Kenya 56 #14’ (the best-quality hybrid) averaged 12.3% more digestible dry matter than Coastal bermuda over a 4-year period. With the same forage intake, 1,760-kg (800-lb) steers should gain 30% more per day with this hybrid than with Coastal bermudagrass. Fiftyseven F1 ‘Midland’ x ‘Kenya 61’ hybrids cut at 33 days of age ranged from 45.2 to 59.6% in dry-matter digestibility with a 5% LSD of 2.8%. Midland and Kenya 61 parents included in this test gave dry-matter digestibilities of 49.7 and 60.5%, respectively. Dry-matter digestibility, determined by a special nylon-bag technique (the most precise of eight methods used for estimating forage quality at Tifton, Ga.), appears to be well suited for screening many genotypes in a forage-breeding program directed toward quality improvement.

Key Words: Cynodon • protein content • digestibility of forage


1 Cooperative investigations of the Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations, Coastal Plain Station, Tifton, Journal Series Paper No. 3.

2 Principal Geneticist, Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, and the University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations, Coastal Plain Station, Tifton; Research Agronomist, Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, Plant Industry Station, Beltsville, Maryland; and Assistant Animal Husbandman, University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations, Coastal Plain Station, Tifton, respectively. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Dr. T. Hayden Rogers, Chairman, Agronomy Division, University of Georgia, Athens, and Mr. James Dobson, Agronomist, Mountain Experiment Station, Blairsville, Georgia, in obtaining winter-survival data; the Georgia State Department of Agriculture for the protein and crude-fiber analyses; and the Columbia Nitrogen Company, Augusta, Ga., for financial assistance.

Received for publication January 13, 1967.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1967 by the Crop Science Society of America.