Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 7:285-293 (1967)
© 1967 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hesketh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hesketh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hesketh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, D.

Light and Carbon Assimilation by Plant Communities1

J. Hesketh and D. Baker2

In general, the shape of the response curves of leaf CO2-assimilation rate plotted against light intensity is predictable from the CO2-assimilation rate in intense light. Of four factors limiting photosynthesis in intense light, the one causing differences between tropical grasses and other species has received much attention recently. Two other factors, associated with diffusion of CO2, have been well defined; little is known about a fourth factor. Four hypotheses are discussed. The photosynthetic rate of a crop stand may be defined as the product of the amount of light intercepted and the efficiency of the intercepting tissue. Interception depends on solar angle and stand geometry. Efficiency is often constant over considerable periods of time (several examples are discussed). This indicates, in species whose leaves exhibit hyperbolic light response curves, either (a) that there are other important light-intercepting tissues, e.g., stems and fruit, with different photosynthetic light response curves, or (b) that the manner in which light is received by the leaves changes. In the second case, it is implied that leaves move.


1 Journal Paper No. 1040, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona, Tucson, and contribution from the Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, in cooperation with Entomology Research Division and Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station. A part of this research was supported by a National Science Foundation Grant (No. CB-2273) to J. Hesketh.

2 Assistant Plant Breeder, Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station, Tucson, Ariz., and Soil Scientist, Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, USDA, ARS, Boll Weevil Research Laboratory, State College, Miss., respectively.

Received for publication July 15, 1966.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
O. Bjorkman, R. W. Pearcy, A. T. Harrison, and H. Mooney
Photosynthetic Adaptation to High Temperatures: A Field Study in Death Valley, California
Science, February 18, 1972; 175(4023): 786 - 789.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1967 by the Crop Science Society of America.