Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 7:134-136 (1967)
© 1967 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. H.

Sunflower Development at Latitudes Ranging from 31 to 49 Degrees1

R. G. Robinson, L. A. Bernat, H. A. Geise, F. K. Johnson, M. L. Kinman, E. L. Mader, R. M. Oswalt, E. D. Putt, C. M. Swallers and J. H. Williams2

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus, L.) varieties were planted May 14, 1965, at nine locations in central North America ranging from 31 to 49° north latitude. Second plantings were made at four locations to study the effect of planting date.

Seed was soaked before planting and irrigation and fertilizer were used where needed to minimize location differences in water imbibition by seed, soll moisture, and soil fertility.

In plantings made May 14, the growth periods – planting to emergence, emergence to ray flowers, and planting to ray flowers – increased greatly from south to north each degree of latitude northward, days from planting to ray flowers increased on the average nearly 2 days. Whether growing degree-days from planting to ray flowers decreased, varied about an average, or increased from south to north was dependent upon the temperature base chosen. Heights and leaves per plant showed no trend associated with latitude. The lengthening of the three periods of growth from south to north may have been due to temperature gradient rather than photoperiod, since leaves per plant showed no trend associated with latitude. However, daylight durations for the northern and southern locations were only about 16 and 14 hours, respectively, when photoperiod effects occurred.

When practical dates of planting for the locations were compared, i.e., April 5 at 31° latitude and May 14 at 49° latitude, daylight duration when photoperiod effects occurred was about 13 hours in the south and 16 in the north. Under this range of photoperiod, three closely related inbreds – ‘HA6,’ ‘HA7,’ and ‘HA43’ – responded morphologically like short-day plants. Therefore, when such inbreds are used for hybrid seed production, latitude and planting date are important considerations.

Key Words: sunflowers • photoperiod • growing degree-days • heat units


1 Contribution from the Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul; Agronomy Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings; Northwest Experiment Station, Cmokston, Minn.; Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, and Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A and M University, College Station; Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan; Department of Agronomy, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater; Research Branch Canada Department of Agriculture, Morden, Manitoba, Contribution No. 62; Agronolny Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo; Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Paper No. 6006 Scientific Journal Series, Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 Associate Professor and Research Assistant, Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota; Assistant Agronomist, South Dakota State University; Research Agronomist, Vegetable Oil Division, Cargill Inc. (formerly Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota); Research Agronomist, ARS, USDA; Associate Professor, Kansas State University; Assistant Professor, Oklahoma State University; Director, Experimental Farm, Morden, Canada; Assistant Professor, North Dakota State University; and Associate Professor, University of Nebraska.

Received for publication September 2, 1966.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. M. Aiken
Applying Thermal Time Scales to Sunflower Development
Agron. J., April 27, 2005; 97(3): 746 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1967 by the Crop Science Society of America.