Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 7:55-58 (1967)
© 1967 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Frakes, R. V>
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Frakes, R. V>
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Frakes, R. V>

Clonal and Progeny Evaluations in Two Populations of Tall Fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb. )1

J. R. Thomas and R. V> Frakes2

Clonal evaluation and five progeny testing methods (S1, open-pollinated, polycross, single-cross, and F2) were compared for three traits in two populations of tall fescue for 3 years. The three traits were plant height, seed yield, and seed weight. The progeny tests were compared by selecting the best parental clones on the basis of each of the six tests using Duncan's multiple range test, then observing which methods led to the selection of the same parental clones.

The results indicated: (1) there was generally good agreement among years for the traits studied; (2) use of clonal evaluation with 1 year's data might result in loss of equal clones, but seldom would obviously superior clones be discarded; (3) clonal evaluation and Sj and single-cross progeny tests generally gave similar results, while the open-pollinated, polycross, and F2 progeny tests were generally the least useful for detecting differences among the clones; and (4) clonal evaluation would be quite useful in evaluating large numbers of clones for synthetic varieties, but single-crosses should be made and tested to determine the best two clone combinations.

Key Words: breeding • progeny testing • single-cross • polycross • clonal evaluation • seed yield


1 Contribution from Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station, Corvallis, Oregon and Western Regional Forage Crop Technical Committee, W-40. Approved for publication as technical paper number 2162. Part of a thesis submitted by the senior author for the M.S. degree, Oregon State University. Technical Paper No. 2162, Oregon State University. Technical Paper No. 2162, Oregon Agricultural Exp. Sta.

2 Plant Breeder, Farmers Forage Research (Formerly Graduate Research Assistant, Oregon State University) and Associate Professor of Plant Breeding, Department of Farm Crops, Oregon State University.

Received for publication July 5, 1966.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. D. Berdahl and I. M. Ray
Comparison of S1 with Open-Pollination Progenies in Selection for Yield in Crested Wheatgrass
Crop Sci., May 1, 2004; 44(3): 768 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1967 by the Crop Science Society of America.