Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 6:547-551 (1966)
© 1966 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Feltner, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Young, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Feltner, K. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Young, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Feltner, K. C.

Managerial and Physiological Factors Influencing the Winter Hardiness of Barley in Wyoming1

A. L. Young and K. C. Feltner2

The environmental factors air and soil temperature and soil moisture were monitored as they influenced the crown sugars glucose, fructose, and sucrose in three varieties of winter barley planted on two fall dates.

‘Dicktoo’ (winter hardy), ‘Reno’ (intermediate), and ‘Tennessee Winter’ (nonhardy) were planted on August 25 and September 10, 1964, at Laramie, Wyoming. Crown tissue was periodically collected (from October 17, 1964, to May 1, 1965) and analyzed for sugar content.

Later planting enhanced winter survival of Dicktoo and Tennessee Winter, but did not appreciably influence Reno. In Dicktoo, fructose was the major alcohol-soluble sugar during the fall and early winter, decreased during the late winter, and disappeared at time of spring regrowth. Glucose and sucrose content increased in the late winter and decreased at time of spring regrowth. Fructose content in crowns of Tennessee Winter was significantly lower than in the other varieties, although the trend with time was similar in all varieties. Only small amounts of glucose and sucrose were present in the Tennessee Winter variety at any given collection date.

The important factor in survival of the nonhardy Tennessee Winter variety was apparently soil moisture at the 3-inch depth and fructose content, while in Dicktoo it was low soil and air temperature and its influence upon the synthesis of total alcohol-soluble sugars.


1 Contribution from the Plant Science Division, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyo. This investigation was supported in part by Wyoming Experiment Station Project W. S. No. 865. Published with approval of the Director, Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station as Journal Paper No. 278.

2 Graduate Assistant (now Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas) and Assistant Professor of Crop Physiology (now Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University), respectively.

Received for publication May 21, 1966.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1966 by the Crop Science Society of America.