Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 6:492-494 (1966)
© 1966 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Buker, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davis, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Buker, R. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Davis, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Buker, R. J.

Predicting Yields from Associated Characters in Medicago sativa L.1

R. L. Davis and R. J. Buker2

The F1 progenies of eight clones of Medicago sativa crosed in all combinations and the polycross progenies of the eight clones were seeded in 10-foot rows. Coefficients of determination for multiple regression of dry weight of plants on July 21 and September 6 with characters associated with dry weight (height, width, stand, % leaves, and Leptosphaerulina leafspot) varied from 0.61 to 0.68 when calculated on an individual plot basis. Predictive equations were generated for both dates using F1 and polycross data. Correlation coefficients calculated on means between F1 observed and predicted yield were 0.89 and 0.90, respectively, for July 21 and September 6 harvest, using the predictive equation generated from F1 data. The correlations between F1 observed and predicted yields were 0.89 and 0.92, respectively, for the July 21 and September 6 harvest, using the predictive equation generated from the polycross data. Selection based on the variables associated with dry weight would be 96% and 109% as effective as selection based on actual dry weight for the July 21 and September 6 harvest respectively.


1 Contribution from Agronomy Department, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana. Journal Paper No. 2792 of the Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station. Part of a thesis submitted by junior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree. Financed in part by a grant from Farmers Forage Research, Lafayette, Indiana.

2 Professor of Agronomy and former Graduate Research Assistant, now Director of Research, Farmers Forage Research, Lafayette, Ind.

Received for publication April 16, 1966.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1966 by the Crop Science Society of America.