Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 6:275-280 (1966)
© 1966 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eberhart, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cockerham, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eberhart, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cockerham, C. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eberhart, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cockerham, C. C.

Epistatic and Other Genetic Variances in Two Varieties of Maize1

S. A. Eberhart, R. H. Moll, H. F. Robinson and C. C. Cockerham2

We obtained full-sib and half-sib covariances in two open-pollinated varieties of maize, ‘Jarvis’ and ‘Indian Chief,’ from families derived from both inbred and noninbred parents. These covariances provide estimates of additive, dominance, and certain estimable functions of epistatic variances, and are useful to investigate the relative importance of the different types of genetic variation in these varieties.

Seven characters were studied in both varieties, and no evidence of epistatic variance was noted except possibly for yield in Indian Chief. During development of the random inbred lines natural selection increased ear number and yield in both varieties. It may also have reduced the total genetic variance for characters that showed no change in the mean.

Both the observed and "expected" standard errors were smaller for estimates of variance components obtained from the Design II than from the Design I experiments. Observed standard errors of the experimental error variances were larger than "expected standard errors" for both Designs.

Additive variance appeared to account for the largest proportion of the total genetic variance for all characters in both varieties. Hence, recurrent selection should be effective in improving these varieties.


1 Joint contribution of the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station and the Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, cooperating. Part of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of requirements for the Ph.D. degree. Published with the approval of the Director of Research as Paper No. 2061 of the Journal Series. The work was supported in part by Rockefeller Grant 60179 and in part by Public Health Research Grant GM 11546.

2 Formerly graduate assistant and Geneticist Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, Raleigh, N.C. (now Research Geneticist, Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, Kitale, Kenya); Professor of Genetics; Administrative Dean for Research and Professor of Genetics; and Professor of Statistics, respectively.

Received for publication November 30, 1965.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. R. Hallauer
History, Contribution, and Future of Quantitative Genetics in Plant Breeding: Lessons From Maize
Crop Sci., December 18, 2007; 47(Supplement_3): S-4 - S-19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1966 by the Crop Science Society of America.