Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 6:235-239 (1966)
© 1966 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richmond, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richmond, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, L. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Richmond, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, L. L.

Product-Quantity Measures of Earliness of Crop Maturity in Cotton1

T. R. Richmond and L. L. Ray2

We used 3 stocks of American Upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., and the 3 possible crosses among them, as experimental materials for a study of productquantity estimates of earliness of crop maturity. The investigation involved 3 measures of earliness: (1) amount of crop harvested (ACH); (2) percentage of crop harvested (PCH); and (3) mean maturity date (MMD). We took data and calculated genetic and statistical parameters on the parental lines and the F2 populations of the 3 crosses. MMD, which gave the highest heritability values, was considered to be the most discriminating and the most reliable of the 3, both for studies of the genetics of earliness and for use in breeding programs in which earliness, without regard to total or potential yield, is the prime objective. The reliability of ACH and PCH measures in genetic analyses of earliness is subject to further question because of the correlation between their variabilities and the percentage of bolls open at the time of measurements. Since the method of calculating MMD does not take yield into account directly, ACH or PCH measures will be more effective in those phases of the breeding program in which maximum-yield-in-minimumtime is a major consideration. Of the two, ACH appears to be the more desirable. The importance of the proper date or period on which to base the calculations is emphasized. while no single measure stood out as being completely acceptable in all breeding situations or under all conditions, the experiments show that reasonably reliable measures or estimates of earliness of crop maturity in cotton are available for application to specific, welldefined plant breeding problems or crop improvement objectives.


1 Coutribution from the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station (South Plains Research and Extension Center, Lubbock, Texas), Texas A&M University in cooperation with the Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA. Taken in part from material submitted by the junior author in partial fulfillment of reqnirements for the Ph.D. degree at Texas A&M University.

2 Research Agronomist, Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA (Professor of Agronomy, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station) and Associate Agronomist, South Plains Research and Extension Center.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1966 by the Crop Science Society of America.