Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 6:231-234 (1966)
© 1966 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rutger, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rutger, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rutger, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. C.

Variation and Covariation in Agronomic and Malting Quality Characters in Barley I. Heritability Estimates1

J. N. Rutger, C. W. Schaller, A. D. Dickson and J. C. Williams2

‘Atlas’, a coast-type barley that possesses desirable agronomic characteristics, was crossed with ‘Kindred’, a Manchurian-type barley characterized by superior malting quality but which shatters severely in arid climates. Fourteen agronomic and 13 malting quality traits were studied in a population of 102 random F4 lines grown at 2 planting dates in 1962. Four of the agronomic traits were studied again in 1963.

Genotype x environment interaction variances generally were small relative to genotypic variances. Significant (5% level) genotype x planting date interactions were present for only 4 of the 27 traits evaluated in 1962 and for only 1 of the 4 traits studied in both years. Five of the 6 significant genotype interactions in the 2-year data involved year terms.

Higher estimates of heritability generally were obtained for malting quality traits than for agronomic traits, although heritability estimates for a majority of the latter were 0.7 or greater. One notable exception was yield, for which heritability was estimated to be 0.48.

Predicted selection advances indicated that it should be possible to make substantial gains in most individual characters. However, predicted advances from one cycle of selection for yield, malt extract, wort nitrogen, diastatic power, and beta amylase were less than the amounts needed to achieve preferred levels.


1 Contribution from the Department of Agronomy, University of California, Davis, California, and the Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA. Some of the results reported are from work supported by grants from the Malting Barley Improvement Association, the Davis Campus Committee on Research (DG-30), and National Institutes of Health (FR-00009). Part of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of requirements for the Ph.D. degree.

2 Formerly Research Assistant (now Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Breeding, Cornell University); Professor of Agronomy, University of California; Chemist, Crops Research Division, Barley and Malt Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin; and Assistant Agronomist, University of California.

Received for publication December 9, 1965.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1966 by the Crop Science Society of America.