Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 6:25-27 (1966)
© 1966 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weber, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Caldwell, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weber, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Caldwell, B. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Weber, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Caldwell, B. E.

Effects of Defoliation and Stem Bruising on Soybeans1

C. R. Weber and B. E. Caldwell2

Investigations were conducted to determine the effects of (a) early defoliation on soybeans from emergence through stage 1 and (b) various degrees of stem bruising and defoliation individually and combined.

Data from early defoliation indicated that at least one cotyledon was essential for maximum yield after emergence and, in the absence of the unifoliolate leaves the cotyledons were of value 12 days after emergence. Cut-off below the unifoliolates and complete defoliation at stage 1 treatments indicated the great recuperative ability of soybean plants.

The bruising and defoliation experiment indicated that bruising and defoliation were interrelated in producing yield loss in soybeans. Stem breakage resulted from the severity and location of the stem bruise, and to the amount of defoliation. Bruising was more important than breakage in causing yield loss.


1 Joint contribution from Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, as No. 424 of the U. S. Regional Soybean Laboratory, and the Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa, Project No. 1179; Journal Paper No. J-5154. This study was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the Hail Insurance Adjustment and Research Association and 15 mutual hail insurance companies.

2 Agronomist, Crops Research Division, USDA, and Professor, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa; and Agronomist, Crops Research Division, Beltsville, Md., respectively.

Received for publication June 26, 1965.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. A. Coulter and E. D. Nafziger
Yield and Agronomic Responses of Soybean to Cotyledon and Unifoliolate Node Removal
Crop Sci., January 16, 2008; 48(1): 353 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1966 by the Crop Science Society of America.