Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 6:11-14 (1966)
© 1966 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubis, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by McGregor, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rubis, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by McGregor, S. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rubis, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by McGregor, S. E.

Effects of Honey Bee Activity and Cages on Attributes of Thin-Hull and Normal Safflower Lines1

D. D. Rubis, M. D. Levin and S. E. McGregor2

Two safflower lines, a thin-hull and normal, were subjected to three treatments; caged without bees, caged with bees, and not caged with bees, at Tucson, Arizona. Cage and bee effects were determined on eight attributes and the daily foraging activity of honey bees on the two lines were observed.

Cage treatments decreased yield, bushel weight, and hull percentage and increased oil percentage of the normal line. On the thin-hull line cage effects were of a smaller magnitude but decreased yield, number of seeds per head and percentage of deformed seedlings and increased germination percentage. Effects of bee pollination on the normal line were non-significant except for a slight decrease in hull percentage. Bee pollination in the thin-hull line doubled yield, quadrupled the number of seeds per head, reduced weight per 100 seeds, and increased oil percentage.

Honey bee activity differed on the two lines. Pollen collectors worked only the normal line whereas nectar collectors worked both lines equally.


1 Contribution from the Department of Agronomy and Entomology Research Division, ARS, USDA, Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station, Tucson, Arizona. Published with the approval of the Director of the Arizona Agr. Exp. Sta. as Journal Article No. 970

2 Agronomist, Arizona Agr. Exp. Sta., and Entomologists, Entomology Research Division, ARS, USDA, respectively.

Received for publication March 2, 1965.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. C. Johnson, T. J. Kisha, and M. A. Evans
Characterizing Safflower Germplasm with AFLP Molecular Markers
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1728 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1966 by the Crop Science Society of America.