Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 7 August 2009
Published in Crop Sci 49:1719-1725 (2009)
© 2009 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayor, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bernardo, R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mayor, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bernardo, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mayor, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bernardo, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Marker-assisted selection

CROP BREEDING & GENETICS

Genomewide Selection and Marker-Assisted Recurrent Selection in Doubled Haploid versus F2 Populations

Patricio J. Mayor and Rex Bernardo*

Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, 411 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Cir., St. Paul, MN 55108

* Corresponding author (bernardo{at}umn.edu).

Molecular markers have been previously found useful for increasing genetic gain in maize (Zea mays L.). The use of doubled haploids (DHs) instead of F2 plants (or, equivalently, F3 families) may permit a better estimation of marker–trait associations. Our objective was to determine the usefulness of DH versus F2 populations in marker-assisted recurrent selection (MARS) and genomewide selection. We simulated testcrosses from a DH population and an F2 population from the same cross between two inbreds and studied genetic models defined by the number of quantitative trait loci (QTL) and trait heritability (H). Equal-time comparisons of selection response were between Cycle 3 with an F2 population and Cycle 2 with a DH population. For the genetic model of 100 QTL, H = 0.20 and a population size of N = 100, the ratio of response to selection in DH versus F2 populations was RDH:F2 = 109% for genomewide selection and 128% for MARS. For the genetic model of 20 QTL, H = 0.80 and N = 100 these values decreased to 99% for genomewide selection and 109% for MARS. Although genomewide selection was superior to MARS for a given type of population, the advantage of using DH instead of F2 populations was greater in MARS than in genomewide selection. We concluded that DH populations are most useful in genomewide selection and MARS when many QTL control the trait, H is low, and N is small.

Abbreviations: DH, doubled haploid • MARS, marker-assisted recurrent selection • QTL, quantitative trait loci • RDH:F2, ratio between the cumulative response to selection in the DH population and the cumulative response to selection in the F2 population • RGWS:MARS, ratio between the cumulative response to genomewide selection and the cumulative response to MARS • VG, genetic variance • VM, variance explained by markers • VR, residual variance







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Crop Science Society of America.