HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Free via Open Access Figures Only OA Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Supplemental Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saha, M. C. Articles by Hopkins, A. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Saha, M. C. Articles by Hopkins, A. A. Agricola Articles by Saha, M. C. Articles by Hopkins, A. A. Related Collections Other Forage Crops Plant Genetic Resources Crop Genetics

PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES

Genetic Variation within and among Wildrye (Elymus canadensis and E. virginicus) Populations from the Southern Great Plains

Forage Improvement Division, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc., Ardmore, OK 73401

^* Corresponding author (aahopkins{at}noble.org).

There is interest in Canada wildrye (CWR, Elymus canadensis L.) and Virginia wildrye (VWR, E. virginicus L.) for conservation and forage uses. Our objectives were to identify a set of molecular markers to assess genetic structure within and diversity among populations of CWR and VWR from the Southern Great Plains and to determine if these populations had an associated fungal endophyte. Nine CWR and five VWR populations and two barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars were genotyped using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers isolated from tall fescue [Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) Darbysh.] expressed sequence tags (TF ESTs). Scorable fragments were produced by 31% of TF EST-SSRs tested, thus identifying a set of SSR markers for wildrye. Populations grouped into three clusters consisting of (i) three wild populations, one plant introduction, and two commercial sources of CWR; (ii) all VWR populations and three CWR plant introductions; and (iii) barley cultivars. Clustering indicated possible gene flow between CWR and VWR. Genetic variation within populations was minimal and comparable to that of the barley cultivars. Thus, unlike many ancestral cultivars and landraces of self-pollinated crops, CWR and VWR populations consisted of essentially pure lines and can be handled as such in a breeding program. Potentially sexual and asexual epichloë endophytes were found in several populations, indicating the need to account for endophytes in breeding and germplasm conservation efforts of wildrye.

Abbreviations: CWR, Canada wildrye • PCR, polymerase chain reaction • SSR, simple sequence repeat • TF EST, tall fescue expressed sequence tag • UPGMA, unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean • VWR, Virginia wildrye