Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 11 May 2009
Published in Crop Sci 49:1063-1070 (2009)
© 2009 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dernoeden, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dernoeden, P. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dernoeden, P. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Turfgrass Management
Right arrow Root Growth
Right arrow Turfgrass

TURFGRASS SCIENCE

Creeping Bentgrass Putting Green Turf Responses to Two Summer Irrigation Practices: Rooting and Soil Temperature

Jinmin Fua and Peter H. Dernoedenb,*

a Wuhan Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan City, Hubei 430074, P.R. China
b Dep. of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742

* Corresponding author (pd{at}umd.edu).

Light and frequent (LF) and deep and infrequent (DI) irrigation are two common practices for golf course managers. Few studies have compared the effects of these two opposing irrigation practices on summer root performance in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.). The objectives of this field study were to quantify summer root development and longevity in response to LF vs. DI irrigation in ‘Providence’ creeping bentgrass grown on a sand-based rootzone. The LF plots were irrigated daily to moisten the upper 4 to 6 cm of soil, whereas DI plots were irrigated at leaf wilt to wet soil to a depth ≥24 cm. Root measurements were obtained using the minirhizotron imaging technique and included total root count, total root length (TRL), total root surface area (TRSA), and average root diameter. When averaged over the entire 0- to 24-cm rootzone depth, DI-irrigated creeping bentgrass produced a greater number of roots, longer root lengths, and a larger root surface area than LF-irrigated turf. Average root diameters were smaller in DI-irrigated creeping bentgrass in the summer of 2007. Compared with data collected in 2006, the 2-yr-old turf had 55 and 32% fewer roots in LF- and DI-irrigated bentgrass by September 2007, respectively. There were similar reductions in TRL and TRSA between years in both irrigation regimes. Deep and infrequent irrigation stimulated root growth throughout the 0- to 24-cm rootzone in May and June and promoted root longevity in summer.

Abbreviations: ARD, average root diameter • DI, deep and infrequent irrigation • ET, evapotranspiration • LF, light and frequent irrigation • TRC, total root count • TRL, total root length • TRSA, total root surface area




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Fu and P. H. Dernoeden
Creeping Bentgrass Putting Green Turf Responses to Two Irrigation Practices: Quality, Chlorophyll, Canopy Temperature, and Thatch-Mat
Crop Sci., May 11, 2009; 49(3): 1071 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Crop Science Society of America.